Dotted Border

View All Tags


The inclusion of dotted borders on many ancient coins, particularly in Greek and Roman numismatic traditions, served both functional and symbolic purposes. The dotted border was a prominent feature in the design of coins, often encircling the obverse and reverse sides, and its use can be traced back to the earliest coinages of the ancient world.

One of the primary functional reasons for the dotted border was protection against counterfeiting. In the ancient world, coins were often struck by hand, and their edges could be easily filed down or shaved to remove precious metal, thus reducing their value. By adding a dotted or beaded border around the coin’s design, mint authorities made it more difficult for fraudsters to alter or clip the edges without damaging the overall design. The border effectively created a physical boundary that prevented the removal of precious metal while keeping the coin’s imagery intact. Additionally, these borders helped ensure that the design elements—such as the face of a ruler or symbols of the issuing city—remained fully visible and undamaged, preserving the integrity of the coin’s messaging.

Another important reason for the use of dotted borders was aesthetic and symbolic value. The border helped frame the central imagery of the coin, giving it a more structured and polished appearance. The repeating pattern of dots or beads added a sense of rhythm and balance to the overall design, elevating the coin from a simple piece of currency to a work of art. In the symbolic sense, the border could also serve to reinforce the official nature of the coin, marking it as a product of state-sanctioned authority and legitimacy. The presence of such borders could be interpreted as a visual signal that the coin was minted with governmental or divine oversight, giving it a greater sense of sanctity and trustworthiness.

In some cases, the dotted border was not only an aesthetic choice but also a tool for ensuring consistent production. Coins in the ancient world were often struck using hand-operated presses, and the dotted or beaded border acted as a guide to ensure that the die was aligned properly during minting. This alignment ensured that the design was centered and that the coin maintained consistent dimensions and proportions, reinforcing the idea of a standardized and regulated currency system.

Bedyehibel 375-333 BCE
Aramaic | Dotted Border | Flower | Hemiobol | Sceptre
Samaria, ‘Middle Levantine’ Series
Bedyehibel (or Beruhibel)
Circa 375-333 BCE
Hemiobol AR 10 mm, 0.35 g, 5 h
The Persian Great King seated to right, holding flower in his right hand and scepter in his left.
Rev. The Persian Great King standing right, raising his right hand and holding scepter in his left; behind to left, 𐡁𐡓𐡉𐡇𐡁𐡋 (‘bdyhbl’ in Aramaic).
Meshorer & Qedar 14. Sofaer 91-92
Ex Canaan Collection, Leu Web Auction 2020
  • Bedyehibel 375-333 BCE
    Bedyehibel 375-333 BCE
  • Koinon of Macedon 222-235 CE
    Koinon of Macedon 222-235 CE
  • Lampsakos, Mysia 3rd century BCE
    Lampsakos, Mysia 3rd century BCE
  • Madytos, Thrace 350-300 BCE
    Madytos, Thrace 350-300 BCE
  • Phasis, Kolchis 425-325 BCE
    Phasis, Kolchis 425-325 BCE
  • Philip II 359-336 BCE
    Philip II 359-336 BCE
  • Pleistarchos 305-298 BCE
    Pleistarchos 305-298 BCE